Showing posts with label strain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label strain. Show all posts

Sunday, August 3, 2014

C'mon, Let's Twist Again, Like We Did (This) Summer

Dirk Trauner: natural products chemist, vision researcher, neuropharmacologist,
. . . carbon nano-tube enthusiast?

Apparently, it's "crazy saturated hydrocarbons" month here at JLC. An astute observer clued me in to the Trauner group's latest pursuit - polytwistane. Studied for five decades by organic chemistry pioneers such as Whitlock, Deslongchamps, Oka, and von Rague Schleyer, twistanes have been tricky to coax into existence, owing to their propensity to rearrange into more stable adamantane.

In a 'gedanken' (thought) experiment, Allen, Schreiner, and Trauner mentally "add" bridging ethane units to twistane, stretching it out into a pseudo-helical oligomer (Chem. Eur. J.):

Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 1638.

Some fascinating molecular motifs fall out of their modeling studies. For example, unlike adamantane, polytwistane has three distinctly different C-C bond lengths, a factor chalked up to strain energy. However, it's in no danger of falling apart - the researchers calculate a "very modest" strain energy (~1.6 kcal / mol CH). All the hydrogens occupy positions on the outside (convex) surface of the tube. Finally, note that polytwistane is formally a polymerized version of acetylene, which we'll come back to later.

Emboldened by these in silico  results, Trauner and team take to synthesizing a basic unit of polytwistane, so-called "tritwistane" (Org. Biomol. Chem.). Starting from laticyclic polyenes -- think bicyclo[2.2.2]octene, connected end-to-end -- the researchers try a variety of electrophilic conditions to form the bond in question. Eventually, a combination of bromination / radical reduction produces the simple tritwistane oligomer:
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2014, 108.

At the close of this paper, Trauner deadpans that "attempts to synthesize polytwistane . . .from acetylene itself are ongoing in our laboratory..." Sounds like a tough nut to crack, but if he succeeds, he and his collaborators will have access to a rather rigid, narrow, twisted new material certain to possess interesting properties.

----
*Don't know the song in the title? Say hello to Chubby Checker!

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Pyramid Power!

Atop the energy barrier between hardcore synthetic jocks and dyed-in-the-wool physical chemists lives a dedicated group: the molecular architects. A craving for perfect Platonic shapes, combined with the need to push the limits of bond and orbital theory, drive them towards projects like bullvalenes, cubane, or buckyballs. Despite the obvious challenges - bullvalenes shift and change, cubanes feel some strain - the structures' aesthetic appeal keeps us coming back for more.

Well, another class of shapely compounds seems poised to fall. Enter Pyramidanes*:

Source: JACS | Lee, Sekiguchi
Reported a few days back in JACS by a collaboration between Japanese, French, and Russian scientists, the  near-tetrahedral compounds are within shouting distance of an all-carbon version, never synthesized by human hands. I gotta say, they look pretty awesome. Just staring at it brings up so many questions: what's the hybridization of that top atom? How much strain energy? Could you make some schnazzy ligands from it? How labile is that Sn, anyway? Does this thing blow apart in TBAF?

The crew provides an in-depth discussion of frontier MO theory**, bond orders (fractional all around,
from 0.4-0.7), and NMR properties, concluding that there's a decent structural contribution from the ionic resonance form (see below).

The authors even suggest that the "cyclobutadiene" moiety - the pyramid "base" - can be stuck onto other metals; stable pyramidanes might work as strained-ring storage capsules.

Now I'm excited for the all-carbon version, which (theory predicts) has a lone pair at the apex...crazy!
---

*For the absurdly technical or IUPAC-minded, the authors offer alternative names such as tetracyclo-[2.1.0.0.0] pentane, or (my favorite) [3.3.3.3]fenestrane

**N.B. I'm no p-chemist, so someone else can go through the nitty-gritty there...