Well, to borrow a phrase from Click and Clack, I've come around for the "third half of the show" - figuring out how to bridge the gap between the growing public desire for accessible, informative, entertaining science content and chemistry's approach to that communication. A lot of terms have swirled around this issue: "punching down," #BogusChem, "Inside Baseball," 'in-reach' not outreach, #chemophobia, and "dumbing down," to name just a few.
Thanks for the tip about the magnets, Andre! (P.S. Yes, I know "D" isn't an element) |
Readers: Have a favorite post I haven't included? Send it along in the comments.
Janet Stemwedel, Doing Good Science: "When we target chemophobia, are we punching down?"
Chad Jones, The Collapsed Wavefunction: "Punching down? I don't remember swinging at all."
Ash Jogalekar, The Curious Wavefunction: "Where's the chemistry lobby? On why we need a National Center for Chemical Education."
See Arr Oh, Just Like Cooking: "The Chemistry Popularity Conundrum"
Michelle Francl, Slate: "Don't Take Medical Advice from the NY Times Magazine"; Nature Chemistry: "How to counteract chemophobia";
Paul Bracher, ChemBark: "Combatting Chemophobia"
Rebecca Guenard, Atomic-O-Licious: "Chemistry Isn't Just About Chemicals"
Science 2.0: "Chemophobia - The Unnatural Fixation of Activists"
Chemjobber, Dr. Rubidium, See Arr Oh, Chemjobber: "Chemistry Avengers" (podcast)
Marc Leger, Atoms and Numbers: "Consider the audience when addressing chemophobia"
Chris Clarke, Pharyngula: "Did you know douchebags are full of dihydrogen monoxide?"
Andrew Bissette, Behind NMR Lines: "In defense of #chemophobia"
More to come...
While we're at it, have you seen this ad from thetruth.com?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-ZsUWWipCw#t=26
The ad depicts chemical compounds, and elements, as living organisms. =/
ReplyDeleteنقل عفش شركة المتحدة
دليل شركات نقل العفش
دليل شركات نقل العفش
شركة نقل عفش بالمدينة المنورة
شركة نقل عفش بالرياض
شركة نقل عفش بجدة
شركة نقل عفش بمكة
نقل عفش بمكة
شركة نقل عفش بالطائف
شركة نقل عفش بينبع