Friday Fun: Google Scholar Surprises

From Google, a.k.a. the guys with all the data, comes the most recent Google Scholar metrics.

I'm starting to really enjoy the level of specificity Google's learned around academic sub-fields. For instance, in my own sub-field of organic chemistry, who knew that Green Chemistry and Molecules were rising so quickly through the ranks of top-cited publications?

The h5-index Google's using seems like a shot across the bow of the venerable Thomson Reuters Impact Factor. A glance through the top-cited papers across all of chemistry, couched in this 5-year zetigeist, shows some surprising trends in the field: tunable materials, solar conversion, nanoparticles, and genomic medicine win the day - nary a major total synthesis among the top-cited 'scripts of any journal I could find.

If you have a minute, play around - the Google site is clean, easy to navigate, and provides direct links to publications of interest. If you stumble across anything surprising, let me know in the comments!

Happy searching, Happy Friday!
See Arr Oh

A Chempubs Hat Trick

Slow down, Guangbin!
(said I, channeling my inner Dr. Freddy...)

Guangbin Dong of the University of Texas-Austin has just published three papers in three different journals with Impact Factors over three. What's more - he did it all in the same week.

Just think of them as buckyballs

The papers in question?

"Regioselective ketone alpha-alkylation with simple olefins by dual activation"
Science, published 4 July 2014; 2013 IF: 31.0

"Cooperative alkylation of cyclobutanones and olefins leads to bridged ring systems by a catalytic [4+2] coupling"
Nature Chemistry, published 6 July 2014; 2013 IF: 21.8

"Alkylation of rhodium porphyrins using ammonium and quinolium salts"
Organometallics, published 7 July 2014; 2013 IF: 4.1

I hereby institute the Chempubs Hat Trick - Three papers, Three Journals, IF > 3.0, one week.

Congratulations to Prof. Dong for winning the inaugural award! But, I'm sure I've missed others who've been so deserving. Readers, have you noticed anyone else - present OR past! - who made this many simultaneous "shots on goal"?

Leave awardees' names in the comments!

Same (Space) Science, Different (Dino) Day

"Five Acids" -  Duplicated in five papers
(PNAS, OLEB, IJC,  TL, JACS)

For those new to the Breslow #spacedino saga, Paul's collection of links back at ChemBark might be the best place to start. Long story short: a tongue-in-cheek press release proclaiming "Dinosaurs from Space!" drew much (unwanted) attention to a prebiotic homochirality review by Columbia University chemistry professor Ronald Breslow. Astute readers and blog commenters noted that the review text strikingly resembled that of earlier papers by the same author.

Well, just how similar were they? Not to incite a flame-war over "least publishable units" (LPUs), but, inspired by ChemBark's commentary on the matter, I've dug through the last six years of Breslow origin-of-life (OOL) publications, and summed up my findings below (Thanks to Paul, Stu, Chemjobber, Ash, Mark, Unity, Martyn, 'Anon,' and everyone else who provided source material for this post!)

"Transamination" - Duplicated in five papers
(TL, OL, OLEB,  IJC, JACS)

Over the last 6 years, I count nine papers that involve, in some fashion, the following topics: homochirality, prebiotic chemistry, enantiomeric amplification, meteorites, or OOL. Here's a list, with full titles, journals, and authorship:

2006 - Tet. Lett. - "Partial transfer of enantioselective chiralities from alpha-methylated amino acids, known to be of meteoric origin, into normal amino acids." Breslow, Levine
2006 - PNAS - "Amplification of enantiomeric concentrations under credible prebiotic conditions." Breslow, Levine
2008 - Org. Lett. - "Enantioselective Synthesis and Enantiomeric Amplification of Amino Acids under Prebiotic Conditions." Breslow, Levine
2009 - PNAS - "On the origin of terrestrial homochirality for nucleosides and amino acids." Breslow, Cheng
2010 - Org. Life Evol. Biosph. - "Imitating Prebiotic Homochirality on Earth." Breslow, Levine, Cheng
2010 - PNAS - "L-amino acids catalyze the formation of an excess of D-glyceraldehyde, and thus of other D sugars, under credible prebiotic conditions." Breslow, Cheng
2011 - Isr. J. Chem. - "Formation of L Amino Acids and D Sugars, and Amplification of their Enantioexcesses in Aqueous Solutions, under Simulated Prebiotic Conditions." Breslow
2011 - Tet. Lett. - "The origin of homochirality in amino acids and sugars on prebiotic earth." Breslow
2012 - JACS - "Evidence for the Likely Origin of Homochirality in Amino Acids, Sugars, and Nucleosides on Prebiotic Earth." Breslow

"Formose" - Duplicated in four papers
(OLEB, IJC, TL, JACS)

*So, for those keeping count at home, that's "Prebiotic" = 7, "Amino Acids" = 7, "Origin" = 4, "Chirality" = 4, "Sugars" = 4...and we're not yet past the titles!

(Throughout the post, I've also compared similar Figures, a task Paul and other bloggers had started tackling. I've examined each one in the context of the other eight.)

Poring over the text, many of the papers fall into similar thematic traps. First, Breslow poses a "big question" or concept (OOL, homochirality, etc.), then discusses the Murchison "carbonaceous chondritic meteorite." Breslow references the work of Cronin and Pizzarello, and discusses circularly polarized light, white dwarf stars, and synchrotron radiation. The Breslow "formose reaction" paper (Tet. Lett., 1959, 22-26) sets the stage for the D sugars, and the group's transamination / amplification work for the L-AA papers.

"Nucleosides" - Duplicated in five papers
(TL, OLEB, IJC, PNAS, JACS)

Dead-center in the most recent four papers (OLEB, TL, IJC, JACS), one finds the Morowitz equation, which explains enantiomeric amplification from tiny initial excesses of single enantiomers. Unfortunately, one also finds the most glaring piece of self-plagiarism: the kinetics paragraph. As noted by Stuart Cantrill and several others, full pages are duped among the separate articles - TL p. 4229 is identical to JACS p. 5-6, IJC from 992-993, and (almost) OELB from 20-21.

Even the dinosaur joke, that witty aside that brought all the attention to the paper in the first place, was repeated three times! (IJC, TL, JACS). This inclusion almost begs the question . . .did Breslow wish to be caught?

Obligatory dinosaur image
Source: stegosaurus.com

Nonetheless, the offending paper has been removed from the JACS website, and further editorial action likely awaits him. I remain puzzled, however. How could an academic legend, a chemical pioneer, a man whose research has launched quite a few stelllar professorships (Gellman, Schepartz, Groves, Grubbs, among others), simply reissue the same science, over and over again, in different journals? Breslow continually mentions "credible" conditions; was this because the papers were less so? There's also the puzzling publication order, from 'worst to first.' Breslow re-publishes tenuous material from TL (Impact Factor = 2.6) in JACS (I.F. = 9.0), where visibility no doubt increases? Generally, high-impact research starts out in high-impact journals, and later trickles down.

Time will tell what will happen to the #spacedino paper. My final hope would be that aspiring academics and graduate students watch the situation unfold, and take care against any similar publishing behavior.