So the atomic bomb diagram was not demonstrating 'fusion' (hydrogen) but rather just the part where they slam transuranic elements together. Since both plutonium and uranium were both used as fission sources, how was one to decide?
I missed that one and the last one (didn't know if it was Einstein or Mendeleev).
I got that the bomb one was talking about fission, but I think I assumed they were talking about a compression device (which was plutonium) and not the gun barrel device (which was uranium, I think), but the compression one could have been drawn differently, I guess (O ---> o ----> BOOM). Oh well.
Dankwoods makes a resuscitate technique of smoking backcountry for even the most experienced roller. So throw your Swishers in the garbage. Buy Dankwoods Online.
So the atomic bomb diagram was not demonstrating 'fusion' (hydrogen) but rather just the part where they slam transuranic elements together. Since both plutonium and uranium were both used as fission sources, how was one to decide?
ReplyDeleteMy exact critique. I ended my first round going 9/10 : (
DeleteGlad i wasn't alone on that! (eye-rolling emoticon)
DeleteI missed that one and the last one (didn't know if it was Einstein or Mendeleev).
DeleteI got that the bomb one was talking about fission, but I think I assumed they were talking about a compression device (which was plutonium) and not the gun barrel device (which was uranium, I think), but the compression one could have been drawn differently, I guess (O ---> o ----> BOOM). Oh well.
Dankwoods makes a resuscitate technique of smoking backcountry for even the most experienced roller. So throw your Swishers in the garbage. Buy Dankwoods Online.
ReplyDelete